I’ve been trying to recall he last time I was
offended. You know, the last time somebody said something to me which was so designed
to hurt that I was genuinely upset and taken aback.
Pleasingly, I can’t remember. The reason this
is pleasing is that I do at least remember that I don’t like being hurt or
upset. I don’t like being offended. In fact I hope I’m never offended again.
However, it would appear that in this I may be
behind the zeitgeist. The evidence for this is that 31,000 people complained to
the BBC about Top Gear host Jeremy Clarkson’s comments on public sector
strikers (and another 736 complained to the broadcasting regulator Ofcom).
In world where twisted extremists on left and right
regularly spout pseudo-murderous bile, the fact that tens of
thousands more people felt moved to complain about Mr Clarkson than ever pick
up the phone about the BNP or extreme Islamists must mean that he said
something almost beyond belief when he appeared on the BBC’s One Show in
November last year. Let’s have a look.
The exchange came as Mr Clarkson was asked his opinion of the people
engaged in a day-long industrial action over pensions.
His initial response was: "I
think they have been fantastic. Absolutely. London today has just been empty.
Everybody stayed at home, you can whizz about, restaurants are empty."
However, he then added: "We
have to balance this though, because this is the BBC. Frankly, I'd have them
all shot. I would take them outside and execute them in front of their
families."
Well that can’t be right can it? That’s
clearly nothing more than a fairly poor joke about the need for the BBC to show
balance in all its commentary on current affairs. Poor, certainly, but very
clearly a joke.
Not according to the Assistant General
Secretary of the union UNISON, Bronwyn McKenna, who declared that many of those
intending to strike would be scared to do so in case Mr Clarkson’s comments
were taken seriously and they were shot (presumably in front of their families but, in fairness to Ms McKenna, she didn’t specify).
Now only two possibilities exist here.
One – Ms McKenna is suffering from serious and
debilitating issues of delusion and paranoia which have left her unable to
function as an adult in the real world, in which case we must hope she gets the
treatment she so clearly needs and makes a full recovery, or…
Two – She’s being a tit.
In its judgment this week, clearing Mr
Clarkson of breaching broadcasting rules, Ofcom said (with a commendably
straight face): “It would have been clear to most viewers that his
comments were not an expression of seriously held beliefs or views that would
be literally interpreted.”
Not, apparently, to almost 32,000 people though; and this brings me back
to where I started about being offended. Their interpretation of the word is
clearly different to mine. I think it means being shocked by something somebody
says, which you perceive them to mean, and to be left upset by it. To them it
appears to mean “Here’s a chance for me to be centre stage – I will howl with
outrage about this offence until I’m listened to and told my views are important
and, whilst I’m at it, attempt to get all my Twitter followers to do the same.”
Unlike me, thousands of people seem to
suddenly have taken a perverse delight in being “offended”. They would appear
to be sitting through television programmes they loath with gritted teeth,
remote in one hand, phone in the other with the BBC’s complaints department on
speed dial.
I’m lost as to why. If I find something
disagreeable, I avoid watching it. Not a day goes by without comedians on radio
and TV saying brutal things about politicians or personalities they don’t like.
But because I’m a functioning adult I recognise these are jokes, not a call to
arms for the populous to rise up and lynch the subject of the gag.
Mr Clarkson, for whom I carry no particular
torch, apologised for any offence he had caused; rightly, I think, as his joke
was pretty crass and, more importantly, not very funny.
But to the millions out there who read the
initial stories, saw the lunacy of the responses and have now seen the Ofcom judgment,
all this does is reinforce a nagging suspicion that not only is the Left
institutionally humorless and self-regarding, but also has its priorities all
wrong.
I’m reminded of the late, and much missed, Humphrey
Lyttelton, who signed off one episode of BBC Radio 4’s “I’m Sorry, I Haven’t A
Clue” with the line: “If you’ve been affected by any of the issues raised in
tonight’s show, please write to the BBC Helpdesk, Wood Lane, London, clearly
marking your envelope ‘lunatic’".
I don’t believe anybody complained.





























